<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>katagrapho &#187; theological interpretation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dcspinks.edublogs.org/category/theological-interpretation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dcspinks.edublogs.org</link>
	<description>come visit me at dcspinks.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 04:28:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Interpretation 2.0 &#8211; Capsules</title>
		<link>http://dcspinks.edublogs.org/2006/05/08/interpretation-20-capsules/</link>
		<comments>http://dcspinks.edublogs.org/2006/05/08/interpretation-20-capsules/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 00:02:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcspinks</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[theological interpretation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dcspinks.edublogs.org/2006/05/08/interpretation-20-capsules/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In my previous post I suggested that the traits of Web 2.0 might translate well into traits of theological interpretation.  I want to offer some quick ideas&#8211;capsules, if you will&#8211;about how this translation might work.
1. Web 2.0 doesn’t have a hard boundary, but rather, a gravitational core.
It might be better for us to define [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://dcspinks.edublogs.org/2006/05/08/interpretation-20-capsules/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Inchoate thoughts on Interpretation 2.0</title>
		<link>http://dcspinks.edublogs.org/2006/04/13/inchoate-thoughts-on-interpretation-20/</link>
		<comments>http://dcspinks.edublogs.org/2006/04/13/inchoate-thoughts-on-interpretation-20/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2006 23:59:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcspinks</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[theological interpretation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dcspinks.edublogs.org/2006/04/13/inchoate-thoughts-on-interpretation-20/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I left off over two weeks ago on some reflections about Scripture, concluding that further exploration would open up the complex relationship of the Church and its sacred text.  In short, I believe that it is impossible to offer conclusions about the nature of Scripture without considering the community to whom it is Scripture. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://dcspinks.edublogs.org/2006/04/13/inchoate-thoughts-on-interpretation-20/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Bible as scripture?</title>
		<link>http://dcspinks.edublogs.org/2006/03/29/the-bible-as-scripture/</link>
		<comments>http://dcspinks.edublogs.org/2006/03/29/the-bible-as-scripture/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 23:58:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcspinks</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[theological interpretation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dcspinks.edublogs.org/2006/03/29/the-bible-as-scripture/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have established that an exploration into the nature of Scripture is a first priority.  What follows is simply personal reflection on the matter.  I will need to read and reflect more thoroughly as I proceed.
It seems to me that the term &#8220;Scripture&#8221; can be understood in at least two ways.  First, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://dcspinks.edublogs.org/2006/03/29/the-bible-as-scripture/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What is theological interpretation of scripture?: A complex question</title>
		<link>http://dcspinks.edublogs.org/2006/03/24/what-is-theological-interpretation-of-scripture-a-complex-question/</link>
		<comments>http://dcspinks.edublogs.org/2006/03/24/what-is-theological-interpretation-of-scripture-a-complex-question/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2006 23:54:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcspinks</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[theological interpretation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dcspinks.edublogs.org/2006/03/24/what-is-theological-interpretation-of-scripture-a-complex-question/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I should know how to answer this question.  It is after all the topic of my dissertation.  But, the question is not easy to answer.  Much has been written on interpretation in general and even on interpretation of the Bible.  And, I suppose if I am going to get a firmer [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://dcspinks.edublogs.org/2006/03/24/what-is-theological-interpretation-of-scripture-a-complex-question/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
